"Sometimes working within constraints produces the most interesting work" (Branston and Strafford) How have you used real media conventions to produce interesting or effective coursework productions?
Key questions I must cover in my essay:
What does the quote mean and do you agree or disagree?
- The quote means that sometimes working within media conventions can produce the most interesting work.
- I disagree, as creating innovative products is just as important as creating innovative products, which most of the time means thinking outside the box and breaking the conventions. Going against the norm is what modernises products.
4 conventions from each media piece:
Thriller - typically went along with the conventions as it was my first production piece and was apprehensive about breaking the mold. Conventions used were:
- Creating a sense of fear/apprehension/anticipation
- Using a realistic setting to create a sense of 'the unusual' occurring within a normal setting
- Twists and unexpected turns
- Establishing mood and atmosphere
Music video - was able to break more conventions and experiment more. Conventions used were:
- Music and visuals are related
- Lots of close up of artist
- Intertextual references
- References to voyeurism
Broke the convention of using a particular video style for particular music (e.g. rock music using live performance) and was able to encompass the 3 main video styles into one music video - performance, narrative and concept.
Also did not use images of instruments or mouth close ups to emphasize sounds because it was not relevant with my video idea.
Has this made your products more interesting, convincing or effective?
- Following conventions in thriller made it more convincing, and following conventions in my music video made it more effective, however breaking conventions in my music video made it more interesting.
How does your use or challenging of these conventions show progression?
- The fact I was able to challenge more conventions in my music video shows progression by showing how I had become more comfortable with experimenting with different ideas and wanting to make something original rather than following the conventional techniques of a music video.
Did you have a better understanding of the conventions in the advanced portfolio?
- Yes and they were more subtle conventions that were easier to challenge without drastically changing the theme of the music video, unlike with the thriller where if you didn't use the convention of eerie music your thriller would lose its suspense.
Did you think more carefully about which conventions to follow and which to ignore?
- Yes because some conventions fitted certain genres of music and I didn't want my music video to be generic to a typical genre of music, therefore chose to stay away from genre specific conventions and focus on the more generic conventions in order to keep my music video more original.
Did you look at a more specific set of genre specific conventions?
-Yes but chose to ignore them.
How did this make your product more effective?
- It made it more original as I used the knowledge I had learnt from the different genre conventions to try and encompass them all into my music video in order to not be labeled as a specific type of video, giving the audience more variety and making it more interesting to watch.
Did you take more risks in challenging the conventions in your advanced portfolio and why?
- Yes because I was more comfortable about thinking outside the box to make a more original and innovative product. I believe these risks were beneficial in making a media product that my target audience and others could enjoy as it helped my product be relatable to all genres.